Concerns Raised During Public Review of the STR Ordinance

---

Concerns Raised During Public Review

Residents generally expressed support for reasonable safety standards and responsible rental practices. However, many residents expressed concerns that the proposed ordinance, as written, could unintentionally harm homeowners, renters, local businesses, and the overall economy of Ship Bottom.

Below is a summary of the major concerns raised by residents.

Key Issues Identified by Homeowners

• Increased Costs and Fees: Residents raised concerns that the proposed ordinance would have introduced substantial new expenses for homeowners, including licensing fees, renewal fees, inspection fees, and potential penalties. These costs may burden responsible owners without improving community safety.
• Rules Not Consistent With Neighboring LBI Towns: Residents noted that the proposed regulations would have differed significantly from standards used in other Long Beach Island municipalities. Concerns were raised that inconsistent rules could create confusion for visitors and add administrative complexity for homeowners and property managers.
• Potential Reduction in Tourism: Residents expressed concern that restrictions making short-term rentals more difficult or expensive could have reduced visitor activity. Because tourism plays a central role in Ship Bottom’s economy, some believed this could negatively impact local businesses, restaurants, and Borough revenue.
• Operational Burdens on Responsible Owners: Residents identified that several proposed requirements would have added administrative and compliance burdens for owners already managing their rentals responsibly. Some questioned whether these measures would meaningfully address the behavior of a small number of problem properties.
• Financial Concerns: Some residents pointed to public budget documents showing rising debt and operating expenses for the Borough. Questions were raised about whether the ordinance may have been intended to generate additional revenue, rather than directly address safety or quality-of-life issues.
• Limited Evidence of STR-Related Problems: Residents noted that they had not been presented with consistent data demonstrating widespread problems caused by short-term rental properties. Many emphasized that major policy changes should be supported by clear, documented evidence.

Alternatives Suggested by Residents

During the public review process, residents suggested policies that balance community interests with homeowner rights. We believe Ship Bottom can achieve fairness, safety, and accountability without placing unnecessary burdens on responsible residents.

• Clear and Consistent Standards: Rules that align with neighboring towns on Long Beach Island.
• Reasonable Fees: Pricing that reflects administrative costs, not revenue generation.
• Transparent Communication: Open discussions about the purpose, necessity, and financial impact of proposed rules.
• Data-Driven Policy: Decisions based on public evidence rather than assumptions.
• Targeted Enforcement: Focusing on problem properties rather than penalizing all homeowners.

Perspectives Shared During Public Review

During the public review process, some residents emphasized the importance of collaboration between the Borough and the community when developing short-term rental policies. Comments reflected a desire for regulations that balance public safety, quality of life, property rights, and economic considerations, with opportunities for community input and careful evaluation prior to adoption.